{"id":1466,"date":"2017-07-16T05:50:03","date_gmt":"2017-07-16T05:50:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466"},"modified":"2017-07-28T04:07:36","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T04:07:36","slug":"hyip-battles-3-fexfund-vs-satoshi-investments-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466","title":{"rendered":"HYIP Battles #3 — FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>The Winner!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Well, it\u2019s official.\u00a0 Satoshi Investments has closed and FexFund<\/a> wins the Battle by default!\u00a0 As I indicated in News Commentary #128<\/em>, this happened before during HYIP Battles #1<\/em> where we pitted FexFund <\/a>against AxisCrude.\u00a0 In that Battle, just like in this one, AxisCrude closed before Part 2 of the article was published.\u00a0 We at Emily News<\/em> are starting to wonder if there is anyone out there that isn\u2019t going to run away from FexFund <\/a>when we put them to the test.\u00a0 Were these programs planning to close anyway or did FexFund <\/a>scare them away?\u00a0 I guess we\u2019ll never know the answer to this question.\u00a0 However, it\u2019s an intriguing one to think about.<\/p>\n

In spite of the fact that the Battle has a winner, there is a lot we can learn by comparing the investment plans that the two programs offered.\u00a0 In fact, we might even be able to come up with a theory as to WHY Satoshi Investments closed so quickly.\u00a0 So, let\u2019s take a look at the plans.\u00a0 We\u2019ll limit ourselves to the ones that we listed in Part 1 of this article.<\/p>\n

\"FexFund.net\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Analysis of Investment Plans.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As I indicated in Part 1, probably the most important factor to look at when comparing different investment plans is DNI, daily net interest.\u00a0 This is the average net interest or percent profit that you put in your pocket on a daily basis as a result of your deposit in an investment plan.\u00a0 Let\u2019s repeat this information for the seven plans from Part 1 and we\u2019ll give each plan a number so that they\u2019re easier to talk about.\u00a0 Here they are:<\/p>\n

FexFund<\/u><\/p>\n

F1.\u00a0 6% for 20 days.\u00a0 DNI = 1.00%
\nF2.\u00a0 5% for 30 days.\u00a0 DNI = 1.67%
\nF3.\u00a0 4% for 60 days.\u00a0 DNI = 2.33%<\/p>\n

Satoshi Investments<\/u><\/p>\n

S0.\u00a0 3% for 40 days.\u00a0 DNI = 0.50%
\nS1.\u00a0 3.3% for 50 days.\u00a0 DNI = 1.30%
\nS2.\u00a0 3.5% for 60 days.\u00a0 DNI = 1.83%
\nS3.\u00a0 4.0% for 70 days.\u00a0 DNI = 2.57%<\/p>\n

First of all, let\u2019s take a look at plan S0.\u00a0 With a DNI of only 0.50%, it is by far the least profitable investment plan on the list.\u00a0 I can\u2019t see why a person would opt for this plan as there are so many more profitable plans available.\u00a0 One might be tempted to say that the plan is more sustainable because of the low interest rate.\u00a0 This logic is incorrect as, when a program crashes, it is due to the effect of ALL investment plans that it offers, not just one of them.\u00a0 If Satoshi Investments ONLY offered the S0 plan, possibly is might have been a good long term investment.\u00a0 However, since it went along with other more risky programs, it suffers from the same level of risk.\u00a0 So, we\u2019ll eliminate this investment plan from further discussion.<\/p>\n

First, each set of three investment plans appears to be well thought out.\u00a0 As the DNI increases, the length of the plans likewise increases.\u00a0 So, in order for an investor to take advantage of the higher net earnings, he has to commit his funds to a longer investment term — to accept greater risk.\u00a0 This is the way the typical HYIP is set up.<\/p>\n

Next, you should notice that as we advance through the three plans offered by FexFund<\/a>, the GROSS daily interest that is paid DECREASES while for Satoshi Investments it INCREASES.\u00a0 This can be very confusing to the investor and is the reason that you MUST calculate DNI when comparing investment plans.\u00a0 The TERM of an investment plan is just as important as the gross daily interest rate.<\/p>\n

This is clear if you compare plans F3 and S3.\u00a0 They both offer the same gross daily interest rate but the Satoshi Investments plan is more profitable.\u00a0 Why? \u00a0Because the term is longer.\u00a0 Why does this make a plan more profitable?\u00a0 It goes back to how long it takes a plan to break even.\u00a0 For a 4% gross daily interest rate, a plan will break even in 25 days (100\/4).\u00a0 That\u2019s how long it will take to get 100% of your investment back.\u00a0 The time to break even has nothing to do with the length of the plan.\u00a0 So, both these plans will break even in 25 days.\u00a0 After that, all your earnings are pure profit.\u00a0 Since the Satoshi Investments plan is 10 days longer that the FexFund <\/a>plan, you earn profit for 10 more days and, hence, the DNI, your average daily profit, is higher.\u00a0 I hope that this example gives you a clear understanding of the importance of DNI.<\/p>\n

So, just because the gross daily interest rates being offered by FexFund <\/a>DECREASE as the plan length increases, this does not imply that the FexFund plans will be less profitable than the Satoshi plans where the gross daily interest rates INCREASE.\u00a0 I realize that I\u2019m beating this point to death.\u00a0 However, it took a long time for it to sink into my own head.\u00a0 So, there might be a few of you that have a similarly hard time grasping this.<\/p>\n

Once this is clear, you can look at other factors — the main one being the LENGTH of the investment plans.\u00a0 Based on DNI, plans F1 and S1 are comparable.\u00a0 Similarly, F2 and S2 are comparable.\u00a0 And, finally, F3 and S3 are comparable.\u00a0 Concerning length, with the exception of the F3\/S3 pair, the others have greatly different plan lengths.\u00a0 Specifically, the Satoshi Investments plans are around twice as long as the FexFund plans.\u00a0 They have to be longer because they offer a much lower gross daily interest than the FexFund <\/a>plans.\u00a0 In order to have comparable DNIs, a high interest plan with a short term (like FexFund<\/a>) can only be balanced out by a low interest plan with a long term (like Satoshi Investments).<\/p>\n

So, in deciding whether to choose, say, F2 or S2, you have to decide whether you prefer a short term or a long term plan.\u00a0 It is worth noting that the F2 plan is half as long as the S2 plan.\u00a0 So, you could run it through two terms for every one term of the S2 plan.\u00a0 Concerning breakeven points, the F2 plan will break even in 20 (out of 30) days and the S2 plan will break even in 29 (out of 60) days.\u00a0 If you choose to cycle through the F2 plan twice to make it more or less equivalent to the S2 plan, the F2 plan would give you 20 days when you are earning \u201cpure\u201d profit while the S2 plan would give you 31.\u00a0 On this basis, it would appear that the S2 plan is better.\u00a0 However, since you would completed your first F2 plan after 30 days, you would have received 50% net profit which, I believe (I haven\u2019t calculated this out) will more than compensate for the reduced days of pure profit associated with the F2 plans.<\/p>\n

If you wanted to, you could even compound your earnings from your first cycle through the F2 plan and reinvest the whole works for a second cycle.\u00a0 The total net interest using this approach would greatly exceed what you would make with a single investment in the S2 plan.\u00a0 However, there would be a definite tradeoff in this case as you would only have the final 10 days of the second cycle when you are earning pure profit.\u00a0 But, this is getting a little bit too detailed\u2026<\/p>\n

\"FexFund.net\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>Some Conclusions.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Assuming that Satoshi Investments did NOT crash, it would have been hard to pick a winner for this Battle.\u00a0 I probably would have recommended that a person diversify by investing in both of the programs since the plans they offer are so similar.\u00a0 Possibly, I might lean toward the FexFund <\/a>plans because they are shorter term and the risk is less if you only invest for a single term.<\/p>\n

But, why did Satoshi Investments crash? There IS one factor that we haven\u2019t discussed.\u00a0 The minimum investments for the Satoshi Investments plans are considerably higher than for the FexFund <\/a>ones.\u00a0 Specifically they look like this:<\/p>\n

F1.\u00a0 $25
\nF2.\u00a0 $50
\nF3.\u00a0 $500<\/p>\n

S0.\u00a0 $10
\nS1.\u00a0 $500
\nS2.\u00a0 $3,000
\nS3.\u00a0 $10,000<\/p>\n

For FexFund<\/a>, almost all investors can afford to be involved with the F1 and F2 plans.\u00a0 Serious investors can probably also afford the F3 plan.\u00a0 So, ALL the FexFund <\/a>plans are doable.\u00a0 In contrast, for the Satoshi Investment plans, most investors will use the S0 plan and a few serious ones might use the S1 plan.\u00a0 Very few will be able to afford the S2 plan and I would guess that close to none will invest in the S3 plan.\u00a0 So, while the S2 and S3 plans are \u201con the books,\u201d I suspect that they were rarely used.\u00a0 This situation is true of many HYIPs.\u00a0 They often have very high interest plans in their list of options, but the cost to take advantage of them is beyond the reach of almost everyone.\u00a0 In this regard, FexFund <\/a>has chosen a different road and has chosen to make all its plans readily accessible to the great majority of investors.\u00a0 Returning to programs with very high minimum investments, although this cannot be proven, such minimums might be regarded as a \u201cfishing venture\u201d by an unscrupulous Admin.\u00a0 He has his hook out for an investor who will be attracted to the high interest rate and will make the high minimum investment.\u00a0 Once the cash is in his pocket, he will have achieved his objective and will close the program and run away with the treasury.\u00a0 Whether or not this is what happened in this case, we will never know.\u00a0 However, it is something to think about when you see an investment plan that requires an extremely high minimum investment.<\/p>\n

Well, we\u2019ll close on this note.\u00a0 I wonder who will be next to challenge FexFund<\/a>?<\/p>\n

\"FexFund.net\"<\/a><\/p>\n

*********************************<\/p>\n

If one of the programs on our Monitor appeals to you, please support Emily News<\/em> by registering for it on our website. Thanks very very much!<\/p>\n

*********************************<\/p>\n

Be the first to get most important HYIP news everyday!
\nSimply Follow EN Facebook<\/strong><\/a>, EN Telegram<\/strong><\/a>, EN Twitter<\/strong><\/a>
\nor Subscribe to EN Feedburner<\/a><\/strong> and submit your email address!<\/p>\n

If you like this article, please share it by using the social media buttons below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Winner! Well, it\u2019s official.\u00a0 Satoshi Investments has closed and FexFund wins the Battle by default!\u00a0 As I indicated in News Commentary #128, this happened before during HYIP Battles #1 where we pitted FexFund against … HYIP Battles #3 — FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1227,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[155],"tags":[162,85,240,217,215,199,86,221,220,233,232,149,156,158,223,228,253],"class_list":["post-1466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hyipbattles","tag-emilynews-battles","tag-fexfund","tag-fexfund-info","tag-fexfund-investment-plan","tag-fexfund-investment-program","tag-fexfund-news","tag-fexfund-scam-or-paying","tag-fexfund-update","tag-fexfund-updates","tag-fexfund-vs-satoshinv","tag-fexfund-vs-satoshi-investments","tag-fexfund-net","tag-hyip-battle","tag-hyip-battles","tag-satoshi-investments","tag-satoshinv","tag-winner","exalt-entry"],"yoast_head":"\nHYIP Battles #3 - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 - EmilyNews<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HYIP Battles - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 : Different HYIP investment blog. Fair and Fast updates | EmilyNews | EN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Winner! Well, it\u2019s official.\u00a0 Satoshi Investments has closed and FexFund wins the Battle by default!\u00a0 As I indicated in News Commentary #128, this happened before during HYIP Battles #1 where we pitted FexFund against … HYIP Battles #3 — FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2Read more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"EmilyNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-07-16T05:50:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-28T04:07:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Emilynews\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"HYIP Battles - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 : Different HYIP investment blog. Fair and Fast updates | EmilyNews | EN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"http:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Emilynews\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466\",\"name\":\"HYIP Battles #3 - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 - EmilyNews\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-07-16T05:50:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-28T04:07:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d198218498e05856be72796eea940a33\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":200},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HYIP Battles #3 — FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"EmilyNews\",\"description\":\"EmilyNews Blog\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d198218498e05856be72796eea940a33\",\"name\":\"Emilynews\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/080b41979dac9ab029c0867a1655bdaf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/080b41979dac9ab029c0867a1655bdaf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Emilynews\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HYIP Battles #3 - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 - EmilyNews","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HYIP Battles - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 : Different HYIP investment blog. Fair and Fast updates | EmilyNews | EN","og_description":"The Winner! Well, it\u2019s official.\u00a0 Satoshi Investments has closed and FexFund wins the Battle by default!\u00a0 As I indicated in News Commentary #128, this happened before during HYIP Battles #1 where we pitted FexFund against … HYIP Battles #3 — FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2Read more","og_url":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466","og_site_name":"EmilyNews","article_published_time":"2017-07-16T05:50:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-28T04:07:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":200,"height":200,"url":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Emilynews","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"HYIP Battles - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 : Different HYIP investment blog. Fair and Fast updates | EmilyNews | EN","twitter_image":"http:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Emilynews","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466","url":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466","name":"HYIP Battles #3 - FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2 - EmilyNews","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg","datePublished":"2017-07-16T05:50:03+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-28T04:07:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d198218498e05856be72796eea940a33"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/HYIP_Battles.jpg","width":200,"height":200},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?p=1466#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HYIP Battles #3 — FexFund vs. Satoshi Investments Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/","name":"EmilyNews","description":"EmilyNews Blog","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d198218498e05856be72796eea940a33","name":"Emilynews","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/080b41979dac9ab029c0867a1655bdaf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/080b41979dac9ab029c0867a1655bdaf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Emilynews"},"url":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilynews.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}